Politics Sci-Tech Culture Celebrity



So much promise, but needs to be reasonable


In the perfect world of The Editor there would be fewer humans taxing the earth’s resources and fewer still straining those of Queens and NYC.  Regrettably someone else from this borough was recently elected monarch so I won’t be able to impose my will until 2020 and thus will be required to accept compromises, just like everyone else.  That will entail watching large swaths of Long Island City towered up to the sky, much of which has already transpired.

Despite my anti-growth leanings, I’m ok with the status quo and what’s already on the drawing table.  The proximity to Manhattan and easy accessibility to multiple subway lines make LIC such a natural fit for some additional building.  Plus there is minimal if any displacement of existing communities, aka gentrification.  Sure, many businesses are getting priced out and the artistic community will sadly be diminished.  For businesses that’s the natural order, and while I’m not happy about the departure of artists, the area is quickly becoming too sterile to foment anything but ersatz art for the upwardly mobile and the critical mass that creates an artistic community is being unwound.

For those reasons, I am all in favor of the “gentrification” of Long Island City as it is currently zoned, but I am against the gentrification of most other parts of Queens. 1  That is where the anti-everything fight should be taken.

As for opposition to anything at all being built on Waters’s Edge, the request is unreasonable and the arguments are tepid.  First of all there is a lot of nearby parkland, most notably Gantry/Hunters Point South and Murray Park, and adding more in this exact location won’t do a thing for where open space is really needed: Court Square and Queens Plaza.  In regards to the flood plain, the same argument could be made for all the towers along the waterfront.  Developers and owners are aware of and willingly retain this risk, I’m unclear how leaving it vacant will mitigate the risk for these owners, which is what is being implied.  And if it does, why is that a cause worth fighting for?

Ex a real estate collapse, not building on the Water’s Edge site is a non-starter.  Instead I recommend taking a more measured approach, maybe to reduce the size of the project, which per the RFP I show as a pair of 60-stories, down to 40-stories?  Also advocate for what’s really needed for current residents of Hunters Point: a rec center and a pedestrian bridge connecting LIC to the Cornell Technion campus?  These requests are rational not reactionary, and very timely to boot.  Furthermore both the city and the developer, TF Cornerstone, have a lot to gain if only they were shown the light.

//PUBLIC hearing on two new Hunters Point schools, October 24 at 6pm at PS78Q according to The Court Square Blog – see story below for details

CityViews: We Have to Talk About Gentrification in Long Island Citywhere do I begin on these ill-informed arguments?  For one, the diner owner gravely miscalculated his leverage over the sole tenant that could ever make that location work: M. Wells Diner, and thus it’s stood empty the last half decade

Advocates Call for Water’s Edge Development to be Park Land Insteadbe reasonable in your requests, otherwise you’ll end up w/ nothing


Public Hearing on New School Proposals in Hunters PointI did not know there was a 57th Avenue!

Popular Food Vendor Burmese Bites to Open Cart in Court Square“his most popular dish, Keema Palata, which consists of the grilled palata stuffed with minced chicken, onion and egg and topped with a cucumber yogurt sauce

Local Brewers to Hit Annual Queens Beer Festival This Weekendnot to be confused w/ Queens Beer Week, this one’s at the LIC Flea

Roosevelt Island: Part of Manhattan But Apart From It island life as interpreted by the NYT


  1. I also believe there should be no further consideration of rezoning of LIC or Sunnyside Yards for another decade.


Source link

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!